We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. I bought this yesterday – keen to test it out on photos of people – my sigma 35 was damaged, so this will be it’s replacement. Older manual 35 mm lenses: Poor lens. In the end it is either one more thing to carry or you have to plan to shoot a certain style of image. It has some distortion on the edges of the frame, but it’s small, sharp, fast, and the price is great. Similar sponsored items Feedback on our suggestions - Similar sponsored items. While 2 stops slower it is less than half the weight, you don’t have to stop down to f/11 for decent across frame sharpness and you get AF. Review: Sigma 50mm 1.4 EX – Still worth getting in 2020? Probably the 35 with the worst rendering character I have ever seen. $2,448.00. Thanks for the review. Sigma 35mm f1.4 DG HSM Art Lens - Sony E Fit. Bokeh is also not that smooth (still smoother and quite good in close up scenarios at least) and corner as well as coma performance at f/2.0 to f/2.8 isn’t great either. The midframe is another story, there is an area which is hit quite badly by field curvature and focus shifts differently compared to the center and corners. Thank you! It has very minimal signs of wear and, along with the RRS L-bracket, comes with a Wasabi battery, and only has 17215 actuations. There is a bit green behind and magenta in front of the focal plane visible but at the minimum focus distance the problem is somewhat masked by spherical aberration when shooting with wider apertures. If you are after across frame sharpness get this lens and a 5m PCX filter (see this article) to get rid of the field curvature introduced by the Sony filterstack. Apparently there is nothing comparable in this size. It was the only 35mm f/2.8 autofocus prime for the system until Samyang … The Jupiter-12 35mm 2.8 is a copy of the Zeiss Biogon 35mm 2.8 and was produced in the UDSSR after WWII. I think so too, that is why I am barely interested in trying out the M-mount one. Best Astro-Photography Lenses for the Sony A7 series, NOKTON classic 35mm F1.4 E-mount データベース | とるなら～写真道楽道中記～, First Voigtlander 1.4/35 FE review by Phillip Reeve: "this lens is in no way competitive to modern designs" - sonyalpharumors sonyalpharumors, Sony FE lenses: The honest Guide for the a7 series - phillipreeve.net, Sony FE lenses: A comprehensive and independent guide, Guide to Macro Lenses for the Sony a7 series, Beginner’s Guide to Manual Lenses on the Sony a7, Guide to Adapters for Manual Lenses on the Sony a7 series, The Guide to Canon FD lenses on the Sony a7 series, The rated List of Minolta MD/MC Lenses on the Sony a7, Guest Review: Pentax SMC FA 31mm f1.8 Limited, Guide to Ultra Wideangle lenses for the Sony A7 Series V1.3, Sony FE lenses: The honest Guide for the A7/A7II/A7III A7rII/A7rIII/A7rIV A7c A9. Now I will say that the tonality and rendering of the SD10 is quite different from the Quattro…But the high resolution of the Q sensor (and possibly the Sony and other new cameras) simply does not, in my view, mesh well with the older lenses on a practical level and the new sensors expose every defect in those older lenses. There are loads of options regarding 35mm and 40mm lenses, I think the Sigma options like the F1.2 and F1.4 in particular should interest you if you’re purely focused on wide apertures and image quality, the Sony 35mm 2.8 for a light walk around or the newly released Sony 35mm F1.8 for the everyday, balanced approach. Why ? Phillip already reviewed the Sony FE 35mm 1.8. It is even smaller than the 1 stop slower Sony FE 1.8/35 and a lot smaller than the available f/1.4 lenses, which makes it easy to always carry it. If you are looking for a compact 35mm lens this might be worth a look. enlarge.I got mine at Adorama; I'd also get it at Amazon or at B&H.. $3,917.20. But when I use the 28 Takumar on the sdQ, it just doesn’t seem right. As the first full-frame camera to offer five-axis image stabilization, it was a groundbreaking camera when it was released. You can find it at CameraQuest, B&H, on amazon.com/amazon.de and also on ebay.com/ebay.de (affiliate links). I have a Sigma SD10 (a camera from 2004) and an SDQuattro, and the 30MM f1.4 Art “kit” lens. All markings are painted and engraved and there is a small metal screw in type hood in the package as well. What can we expect from Voigtlander’s first classic E-mount lens? Can someone not make a fast 35mm that will work for astro and not break the bank? I love my Sony Zeiss 35mm f2.8, for all sorts of reasons especially for its incredible compact size. Zeiss Loxia 35mm 2.0: This is one of the worst performances I have ever seen. The 35mm comes with geared rings to mount on the focusing ring and aperture ring for use with a follow focus. If you have a bigger budget, go for the Zeiss Batis 25mm f/2. I dislike clinical stf-bokeh and too nervous and this is a class of nervous that does not appeal one bit. This is Zeiss’ most recent rangefinder lens and while there is so much to like it also suffers from midzone dip on the Sony cameras. Wonderful review, many thanks! All other FE 35mm options are over double the price of this Tamron. When stopping down the plane of optimal focus shifts to the back, so you have to focus a bit closer for best performance. Sony FE lenses: Our comprehensive and independent guide. Looks like it was made for the Sony A7. If that is not you there are probably better lenses for you that I listed in the Alternatives section, especially the Voigtlander VM 35mm 1.7 Ultron + 5m PCX filter which is a bit longer but also thinner and only marginally heavier. Some people claim it improves on stopping down, I don’t really see that. The bokeh is very nervous in general and light discs are not evenly lit. I like very much my 40 1.4 on the Sony A7 , It has beautiful colours and contrast. Best Astro-Photography Lenses for the Sony A7 series; Sony FE lenses: The honest Guide for the A7/A7II/A7III A7rII/A7rIII/A7rIV A7c A9; Recent Comments. It’s quite usable for astro even wide open – good sharpness and very little coma. In M-mount Voigtlander released the closely related but not identical 1.4/35 some time ago. Real classic lenses tend not to: including the smc takumar (though it was great in this regard for its era), Performs exactly like a 1970s lens. That said, from other online samples I’ve seen of it at f/8, it’s better than I expected. Sony a7 III Full Frame Mirrorless Camera with 28-70mm and FE 50mm f/1.8 Lens Kit. Sony a7 + Sony 16-35 f/4: $1150 Sony a7 body: The body is in really good shape and has had a screen protector on it since the day I bought it. The 7Artisans 35mm F1.4 (219 euros) is the 2nd full full frame lens for sony from 7Artisans after the 7Artisans 35mm F2 (240 euros) The lens is a little bit less expensive than the F2 while have a faster aperture. And wide open there is very strong vignetting of roughly 3.4 EV (it equalizes the previous record holder the Leica 35mm 1.4 FLE), stopped down to f/2.0 vignetting improves to still rather strong 2.6 EV, at f/2.8 it is 1.9 EV and at f/8.0 still 1.2 EV. This website uses cookies to improve your experience. A7 III also has a sensor based image stabilization system which means that all of these lenses will be stabilized when used on A7 III. If you want best across frame performance best stick to f/11. They are heavy and huge, so If you are looking at this lens you are probably not interested in these. The update seems to refer to the minimum focusing distance (0.3m instead of 1m) the Exif data transmission and the E-Mount compatability. I had a Voigtlander (film) rangefinder and the 17MM Ultron. Wide open the lens is rather soft with quite some glow at these distances. What can we expect from Voigtlander’s first classic E-mount lens? While reviewing the Sony A7 II, I had a chance to test and play with every Sony FE lens made as of April of 2015.The list includes the following lenses: Sony FE 35mm f/2.8, Zeiss Loxia 35mm f/2, Zeiss Loxia 50mm f/2, Sony FE 55mm f/1.8, Sony FE 16-35mm f/4 OSS, Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 OSS, Sony FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS and Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 OSS. While the Voigtlander 5.6/10, 5.6/12, 4.5/15 and 1.2/40 offer a de-click function for the aperture the 1.4/35 doesn’t, just like the 2/65. Thia lens probably work better in a A7s as they have different sensors. As this lens features a symmetrical optical design I was expecting rather high vignetting figures. While it isn’t a perfect lens I think it is optically better in every regard. Thanks for this review. Luckily there is no color cast on A7rII and A7s, unlike with some other fast 35mm lenses. This lens seemed so promising, I could have lived with a rather soft look at f/1,4 and sharp corner to corner at f/8 for a small super nicely built mf lens; can however not live with that bokeh. Sony a7R III Sony FE 35mm F1.4 Sony FE 85mm F1.4 GM Sony FE 12-24mm F4 Sony a7 III +25 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain New this lens costs as much as $799/749€. The best zoom lenses for the Sony a7 III. Pour les sujets en mouvements au n’est pas au même niveau que les Samyang 35mm F1.8 ou le Sony FE 35mm F1.8 mais Yongnuo mettant à jour très régulièrement ses objectifs pour améliorer l’Af on devrait s’en approcher (ex le 50mm F1.8 est à la V9 et le 85mm à la V7) That’s why I bought it. Voigtlander Ultron 1.7/35: . It travels about 110° from f/1.4 to f/16. Instead, the CV 35/1.2 is awesome, and wide open you get a Noctiluxish rendering. It was the direct successor to the Sony a7 and uses the same full-frame 24-megapixel sensor as its older sibling. The official name of this lens is the Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 Lens. Only the extreme corners are noticeably soft. There is almost no loss of contrast and the colors still look great. Hello BastianK, When comparing it to the four other 35mm lenses in my 35mm comparison it is closest to the Loxia in terms of rendering. The 30mm Art is just so much better, in almost every way, except perhaps in size. Sony Zeiss T* FE 35mm f/2.8 (Full-frame and crop-sensor coverage, 49mm filters, 4.2 oz./119 g, 1.15'/0.35m close focus, about $698). This is not an unusual performance for a lens like this; the small diameter certainly takes its toll here. The Voigtlander VM 35mm 1.7 Ultron is a modern design which makes use of an aspherical lens element. The aperture ring has 1/3 stop click stops again which I think is a bit too much. This is such a disappointment. OK, the 35/1.7 Ultron and ZM 35/1.4 leave some hope for a more compact manual focus FE option. The impressive resolution is backed up with fast and innovative AF, 5-axis stabilization, and 10fps burst shooting — all in a compact, robust body. Sony A7 II has external dimensions of 127 x 96 x 60 mm (5 x 3.78 x 2.36″) and weighs 599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz) (including batteries). The “classic” designation relates to the heritage of this lens as its symmetrical optical design is very similar to the older M-mount 35mm 1.4. Get ready for performance that will propel your photography to new heights. If you like the look of this kind of old school symmetrical wide, then at least this one has great flare and contrast control. If you are looking for a compact 35mm lens with mainly stopped down shooting in mind I think this is the better choice, get a used one as new they are a bit too expensive. So I decided it was time to get a new 35mm f1.4 This Sigma ticked all the boxes. Volume and weight of the lens are similar and the performance is really impressive. In this section, We are going to illustrate Sony A7 II and Sony A7 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Voigtlander Nokton 1.2/40 E: Hence this lens in the opposite direction? I share his opinion. Awful, awful…. The focus ring has perfect resistance and travels ~120° from the minimum focus distance (0.3m) to infinity. It’s high built standard, very compact, not that heavy and makes the Sony A 7 / A 6000 pocket-friendly. Thats sad. Still, almost no distortion and a really great landscape and architecture lens at f/8.0. If you are looking for smooth and creamy bokeh this lens is not for you. It’s a great lens with a price tag to match. I would rather recommend the Voigtlander 40mm 1.2 E. Sharpness wide open is anything but great, corners never reach the quality of most other primes and many aberrations like Coma or Astigmatism and even distortion are not well corrected. The Sony FE 1.8/35 has a recommended price of $749. Simple backgrounds look fine, and I liked the image rendering in many of your sample photos. The Voigtlander 35mm 1.7 is slightly longer but the volume is the same or less. Perhaps Voigtlander felt the 35/1.7 would be positioned too similarly to the new 40/1.2? I want only a little mf prime in for travel. Thanks for this review of actual performance and your thoughts on the matter, particularly the idea of these older lens designs on newer digital cameras. Distortion is pretty high for a 35mm lens. This great video review takes a … Some years ago (14 years, maybe?) Sony Zeiss FE 35mm f/1.4 Distagon T* ($1,598): Fast, sharp, and loaded with the latest technology, the FE 35mm f/1.4 ZA offers outstanding optical performance in a versatile 35mm focal length.The fast f/1.4 maximum aperture provides very effective low light capability and shallow depth of field control. Read on to find out. Discover the α7R IV 35 mm full-frame camera with 61.0 MP from Sony & explore all the Cameras features. ... Free shipping . Most of the sample images in this review can be found in full resolution here. I’d say that the best budget option for your trip would be the Sony 28mm f/2. The Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art lens is a beautiful lens that is part of the highly regarded Sigma Art series of lenses. Sony A7 III has a Sony E lens mount and currently there are 126 native lenses available for this mount. Original M-mount Voigtlanders 35/1.4 and 40/1.4 also have terrible bokeh, even worse coma and overall are garbage lenses. As a comparison I included a shot from the same scene taken with the Voigtlander VM 35mm 1.7 + 5m PCX filter. Hi Nat! I am currently looking at my option for a prime lens for street photography and landscapes. Popular . Any time there is a busy background, I see the nervous bokeh and I’m not a fan. Guide to Ultra Wideangle lenses for the Sony A7 Series V1.3; Review: Sigma 50mm 1.4 EX – Still worth getting in 2020? There is noticeable focus shift (see section further below) and I refocused for every shot here. IMO, it lives up to what I consider the ‘classical’ Voigtlander look from years prior to their latest and greatest. With the recent release of the Sony a7 & a7R (http://bit.ly/sonyA7s), there were a few FE lenses announced for the full-frame E-mount format. Looking forward for your response. I prefer 1/2 or even full stops. Waiting for your comparison on the FE35mm f1.4 /Samyang/ and may be the sigma. You can find it at CameraQuest, B&H, on amazon.com/amazon.de and also on ebay.com/ebay.de (affiliate links). I still checked by taking a few shots without electronic contact between camera and lens and could still barely find any lateral CA, which seems to be typical for almost perfectly symmetrical designs. I’ve been using the Voigtländer Nokton 35mm MC classic (bought in 2014) for several years now. I recommend focusing at working aperture with this lens to get best results. This is the modern interpretation of very fast yet still decently compact wide angle lens. The center improves quite a lot already at f/2.0 and reaches peak performance at f/4.0. There are simply too much options here to cover them all but in case you can get by with a slower and bigger lens you may start taking a look at our Canon FD 35 mm comparison.
Les Différents Types De Lecture Au Primaire Pdf, Est Commune En Creuse - 6 Lettres, Texte Poétique Sur La Vie, Les Chats Voient Laura, Festival Des Lumières Paris, Springer Spaniel Caractère, Apprendre à écrire à L'âge Adulte, Tour Du Dévoluy Randonnée Pédestre, Adopter Berger Belge Tervueren, Billet Bateau Marseille Alger Casanova, Mes Apprentissages En Français 2 Pdf,