The International Tennis Hall of Fame and Museum, By Smart Destinations via Wikimedia Commons. Were it not for the recurring tendinitis in his knees, and wrist injuries, Rafael Nadal may well have a few more Grand Slam titles to his already impressive resume. Nadal and Djokovic have won their Grand Slam titles in a much quicker timeframe than Federer. Federer has lost the biggest matches in Grand Slam tournaments to Nadal and Djokovic in the past, because Nadal and Djokovic have played better than Federer. Ad 2: seed in 2021 would prefare strongly RF for first half of the 2021 season. In almost all GOAT rankings Rafa is above Nole mainly because of focusing on Great Slams. Rod Laver is the Greatest Tennis Player of All Time. Since that time, many great players have come and gone. 2) Bjorn Borg retired very early - it was his decision, not injury. In 1974 alone, Connors had a staggering 99-4 record and won the three Grand Slam tournaments that he entered. Eric, you forgot to mention Nadal has 19 majors in 5 less years and 20 less Grand Slam tournaments than Federer. Pick one and enter the court to showcase your skills and emerge as the winner. At 33 years of age and in the late prime years of his career, Djokovic is clearly the best player in the world at the moment and has the potential to win many more Grand Slam titles. Many great female tennis players have graced the courts over the years. I can’t wait to see who will end up with the most Grand Slam singles titles after all 3 have retired. Off the court, Agassi has proven to be a champion as well. Top 30, most definitely. Federer is overrated. We take under consideration GS, weeks at No 1, Olimpics medals, statistical points, and Masters. Nadal is only one Grand Slam title behind Federer, and has played in less than 20 Grand Slam tournaments than Federer and has had to miss many more Grand Slam tournaments than Federer. Durability: The longest-lasting of the tennis court surfaces. Reasons the above 2 points were mentioned: 1) More fairness required for the GOAT rankings. I’m sure you’re happy to claim that. By Suyk, Koen / Anefo via Wikimedia Commons. As the years go by sometimes we tend to overlook or forget just how good the level of competition was. Answer: I suppose it's because Grand Slams are the events that draw all of the top players, which makes them the most competitive tournaments. Both Nadal and Djokovic are greater tennis players than Roger Federer. This article tell you all you need to know about Wimbledon. Question: Why did tennis player Pete Sampras retire early? I don’t care whatsoever if hhfan thinks he’s right. Federer who was brought up on clay has only won 1 French Open. Similar to other Wilson Blade Team Tennis Racquet-(Best Lightweight Tennis Racquet) Wilson offers racquets with fast performance, playable spin-capability, and controllable energy. Physical conditioning is just one part of the equation along with all of the other things that make a player great; speed, agility, mental toughness, shot selection, strategy, etc. Federer’s word matters the most. A: Yes it is, tennis shoes provide the traction and cushioning you require on the field as a tennis player that other sports shoes may not provide. Answer: Absolutely. I have read somewhere that top players have over 60 people on their team? Also, he always showed a charming beautiful personality proper of a true professional sport man; he presented himself in the field as a humble sport man. In tennis you can go for games without seeing something truly outstanding. Proportion 1Y=2GS gives approx. Placing Novak Djokovic on this list was an easy decision, but where to place him was not. As far as Rod Laver is concerned, he can be named the GPOEOAT, Greatest Pre Open Era Of All Time! I think he falls somewhere in the top 15 or so. The debate in tennis over who is the greatest player of all time -- the GOAT -- has raged on for years. What makes moving up for him difficult is that Rod Laver, who many people have never seen play, was really a great player and one of the few from that era that I think would give today's greats a run for their money. Prime examples of players long past their retirement and not remembered for how long they may have been number 1 for or how many lesser tournaments they won are Rod Laver in the mens’ and Monica Seles in the womens’ GOAT, as people unfortunately remember them for their lack of total Grand Slam singles titles won, compared to other great tennis players. Bigger than the majority of sports like Wayne Gretzky in Hockey. Many talented football (soccer) players have graced the pitch, yet some seem to escape the memories of today's fans. I have actually included eleven players here with two greats tied for the tenth position. Likewise, Monica Seles could easily have ended up with more Grand Slam singles titles than Graf, had Seles not been stabbed. Both you and Ivan Lendl make the most sense and the best suggestions. As both players are still competing for things could certainly change, but for that to happen, I think Nadal needs to prove his head-to-head dominance on hard/fast surfaces. Federer is not the GOAT. I think it’s clear that the top two players of all-time are Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal. Nadal is a very professional tennis player. Grass is only one surface. It’s still nice to win those tournaments but it’s not important to them if they don’t as it’s just practice. Nadal is the GOAT. Does professional conduct count? When you take mix of GS & ATP rank - player B is a bit better because he/she stayed at No 1 for a 1 year. It was before my time, but it sounds like he could match it with Connors and the like. Good luck if you think GOAT is the most important statistic to you. Question: Why isn't Borris Becker on the list of greatest men's tennis players? The overlooked selection criteria for GOAT, if we are only comparing the tennis careers of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic, needs to be taken into account, as the great Rod Laver was in a completely different era as far as racquets, professionalism, technology, coaches and entourages were concerned: 1) Nadal and Djokovic have both won their Grand Slam singles titles in a far shorter time frame than Federer, that is 20 less Grand Slam tournaments for Nadal and 18 less Grand Slam tournaments for Djokovic. He changed the diet in 2010 and started to dominate till today. The Master Series Events are compulsory for the top players and although they like to win, many of them would rather play less of them, as it’s a very long season, especially pre the Coronavirus pandemic. Lendl wore down his opponents with his powerful ground strokes, topspin forehand, and incredible level of conditioning. via Wikimedia Commons. Awesome. He missed more GS tournaments during 2012-2016, than he did from 2006-2011. However, in the end, she had only 1 Grand Slam singles title to show for it. Congratulations Mickey Donev. Considered by many to be the greatest tennis player in history, Aussie Rod Laver (aka “The Rocket”) won 200 tournaments, the most in tennis history, plus 11 Grand Slams, and was No. Anderson at age 32 is no youngster by tennis standards, but Federer, at 36 is still able to compete at a high level against younger players. He serves too quickly when the other players aren’t ready. Bliss, Grand Slam singles titles are what players are remembered for long after they have retired. Certainly some players excel on specific surfaces such as Nadal on clay and Federer on faster surfaces, but these players can compete on any surface. Question: Why is not Mats Wilander on the list? Nadal: 2nd most titles, outstanding h2h vs Federer, Djokovic: most dominant at his peak while having toughest comeptition than Federer in 2006, He loves to eat grass (lol), If Federer loses GS title lead, he's out of conversation. Question: How many Grand Slam singles titles has Roger Federer won? Nadal is the GOAT for sure. Of course, Rod has always been a model when it comes to professional values. Your appeal has been dismissed. Really, that is the most laughable, ridiculous and most absurd suggestion I have ever heard in my life when you typed 52 weeks at number 1 equates to 4 Grand Slam singles titles. How many depends on how long they play and how healthy they stay. Top 15, most definitely. I think the number of players capable of winning a Grand Slam title was probably never better than the 1990s. Here's a list of who I consider to be the 10 most underrated players. I would argue that Federer would not have won as many Grand Slam singles titles as he did, had both Djokovic and Nadal started their careers at the same time. If Djokovic ends up with the most Grand Slam singles titles after all 3 have retired, to me he will be the best, but not until he has done it. Anyone who says otherwise is talking complete nonsense! To me, those factors made Djokovic's path towards his greater success was easier than that of Federer and Nadal. This behavior denotes his lack of professional conduct. You simply cannot compare different eras of tennis. Likewise Federer. Rao Srinivas, you forgot to mention the quality of opposition Federer had in the first 5 years of his career, compared to the quality of opposition Nadal and Djokovic had when they started their careers, which was far tougher. Best Tennis Academies In The World | 2020 Updates In my view, there is not a specified or set path to becoming a tennis champion. What they have achieved over a tougher and shorter Grand Slam tournament career is far more impressive than Federer. His best Grand Slam result was reaching the finals of the 1998 Australian Open, which he lost to Petr Korda in straight sets. Time will tell, but for now we place Djokovic at number 3 all-time. Nadal is a better player than Federer and will go down in history as a better player than Federer. What Nadal and Djokovic have achieved in winning Grand Slam singles titles in a 5 year shorter time frame than Federer puts both Nadal and Djokovic above Federer. Since a few years ago I have not observed this behavior. 335 tennis records compared to 164 for 2nd place Nadal. Question: Do you believe Alexander Zverev will be on this list by the end of his career? 2) Both Nadal and Djokovic started their professional tennis careers against each other, Murray and Federer, all at their peak whereas Federer started his tennis career 5 years beforehand without playing against Nadal, Djokovic and Murray at their peak in that period. PeRFect list. There are no awards given out for it. He is currently recovering from the knee surgery he had earlier this year. Again, I repeat, Nadal does this over and over; this is cheating and seriously upsetting for the opponent. With ice water in his veins, the quiet Borg dominated tennis in the late 1970s and had some memorable matches with the likes of John McEnroe and Jimmy Connors. His last Grand Slam title came at the 1972 Australian Open at the age of 37, still a record for the oldest Grand Slam winner. I do not care what anyone else says. According to the three-time slam champion, during a dissertation on the great qualities of Rafa, Nole and Roger, the Swiss champion is the most pleasant to … Perhaps at some point, I will re-evaluate? Don’t forget that Rafa would have had at least 22 to 23 Grand Slam singles titles by now, if not for injuries prior to and during Grand Slam tournaments. Thus far, though, he has been unable to … Unfortunately, from now on, if injuries or any other outside factors prevent one of these 3 players from holding the MMGSST in the future, it will be too bad, whoever you have a soft spot for out of those 3 players, because as a rule, Grand Slam singles statistics don’t lie and is generally what separates the best from the rest. It is not the reason Federer loses to them. John McEnroe: What do we do about Johnny Mac? For purpose of this conversation, lets say Big three are three best players of all time. He is not the greatest. I don’t agree with you or anyone else, only Ivan Lendl. It's a gap. Rene Lacoste goes way back, but he has an impressive resume, and who hasn’t owned one of his trademark crocodile shirts at some point. In the bracket format the fantasy tennis player tries to predict who will be the winner of all tennis matches in a tournament, before the tournament starts. I only care about the Grand Slam singles ladder, rather than the so called, still don’t believe in it, GOAT rankings. Nadal, who is just 1 year younger than he, won 8. As a massive Rafa fan, I just want him to end up with more Grand Slam titles than Federer, because he deserves it in a 5 year less Grand Slam career than Federer. If one player wins 5 GS in 20 years of pro career and another wins the same number of GS in 10 years then my question is, who is better? THE END. But after further analysis, I have noticed that he is a cheater: He frequently distracts the opponent by telling him that he is not ready. But he didn't. HHfan, even if everyone, including me, were to agree with everything you have typed regarding your GOAT criteria, it’s just mine and Ivan Lendl’s opinion only that I know of, all we, that is Ivan Lendl and I, honestly care about is who ends up winning the most Grand Slam singles titles, after all 3 of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic have retired. There are no prizes or trophies for the GOAT but there are trophies for Grand Slam titles. Answer: I think the edge would go to Roger Federer. The same occurs with Laver; you can even argue that Laver probably is the best tennis player ever but that is quite a long discussion and I am not ready to justify it because I don't know enough and requires a detailed research. Federer may be the most popular and the best game to watch but Nadal and Djokovic have claims to be the GOAT, not Federer. One on one results must be the deciding factor if most other criteria are close. Both Nadal and Djokovic are quite within their rights to take the full twenty seconds between serves. Federer is not the greatest. I completely agree with Ivan Lendl. Ivan Lendl and I only want to deal with the reality of facts of who ends up winning the most Grand Slam singles titles. With the exception of the Coronavirus, most top players build their tennis career around playing the Grand Slam tournaments and anything else they may achieve is simply a bonus, not the main priority for them. Nadal is the best. Nevertheless they have shown unlawful, distracting, upsetting behavior that should not have been permitted. You cannot compare different eras, no matter what statistical data you wish to use. You don't have to be an avid tennis fan to sound like you know what you're talking about. Federer is a bad person. Answer: Andy Murray has some work to do before he can be considered in the top 10 all-time. Djokovic also never faced a young Federer on grass (Fed's best surface). Answer: Following completion of the U.S. Open, I plan on updating both the men’s and women’s top 10. Novak also used to have other aggressive actions such as breaking apart his shirt, etc. It’s just not fair! Four years have passed since the last New York Times survey of the best shots in men’s tennis, and the players who dominated that poll in 2014 continue to dominate the latest one in 2018. I watched Ken Rosewall play during the latter part of his career and at the time probably did not realize the greatness I was watching. Dennis Ralston, a five-time Grand Slam doubles champion who was one of the initial players signed to the professional World Championship Tennis tour in the 1960s and a member of the sport's Hall of Fame, died Sunday. Question: Who is the best women's tennis player of all time? He holds both Nadal and Djokovic as true professionals, who behave professionally. Nadal experienced more challenges with injuries, post 2011, than prior to that year. Wimbledon is not the biggest prize. To compete at his age with the next generation of tennis greats speaks volumes to his conditioning and mental toughness. Nadal’s 12 Grand Slam titles on clay currently is in front of both Djokovic and Federer’s combined 11 Grand Slam singles each on hardcourt, from 2 Grand Slam tournaments in the US Open and Australian Open for Djokovic and Federer. Mr Lendl, you are spot on and completely correct with your assessment. Ever found yourself wondering how the men's tennis ranking works? Federer and Nadal deserve to be in the top two positions, in my opinion. Yes, Federer and Djokovic have won more hardcourt and grass Grand Slam titles than Nadal, but Nadal should not be penalised because 2 out of the 4 Grand Slam tournaments are played on hardcourt. He had six Grand Slam titles and three semi-final appearances in the French Open, which was certainly not his preferred surface. But, in the highly competitive world of tennis, he could also succumb to injury and miss out on some of his best remaining years, so the jury is still out on his ultimate place in tennis history. Pete went out on top when he won the 2002 US Open, his last Grand Slam tournament. He’s young and has already reached number three in the world. Today we have: No of weeks at No 1 rank shows us from the statistical point of view that Rafa is able to win a lot of GS, but mainly on clay and it makes hard for him to have "TOTAL DOMINATION" as a No 1 for long period of time. When Nadal, Djokovic and Murray started their careers, they had to play each other at their peak, as well as Federer. You don't have to reply. Question: Why is Ken Rosewall not on this list? What was not to love about the long-haired, blonde Swede with the killer ground game? I won't lose sleep over it since it means so much to Federer fans. Actually, Serena Williams is the best When considering who deserves to be named as “the best tennis player of all time,” gender should be left out of the discussion (although it usually isn’t). What’s part of the last sentence don’t you understand. When all these great players have retired, the history books will show who has won the most Grand Slam singles titles, as well as Grand Slam titles overall. Likewise, Nadal excels on clay so he would have a distinct advantage when playing on this surface. When Pete retired in 2002, he was considered to be the best player of all-time although some would dispute this. However, there are many golfers from earlier eras that also deserve a look. But here we discuss about GOAT which is a kind of intellectual game for fun. The GOAT Federer is #1 on every website and poll! I also don't care if I'm the only person with has this opinion. Given that Laver was ranked number one in the world during this five-year period, it’s likely he would have won many more Grand Slam titles. It was truly amazing that in 1969, Rod Laver eventually returned to playing Grand Slam tournaments, having been permitted to do so, and still won The Grand Slam, 4 Grand Slam titles in the calendar year, having done exactly the same in winning The Grand Slam in 1962, 4 Grand Slam titles in the calendar year. If Djokovic manage to catch up with Federer (20 titles) and Nadal wont have 2+ titles over him... Djokovic wins, because he is more versatile. As a Nadal fan, I couldn't care less about the 1 number ranking, who has been number 1 for the most number of weeks, even if Nadal was that person, to be perfectly honest. Diego, I share your pain with Juan Martin Del Potro. (considering that in 1950 it was much more difficult to maintain a high level of fitness). Dennis Ralston, Hall of Fame tennis player, dies at 78. Few grand slams to Djokovic and few more wins vs. Fed and Nadal (so the score can be even better), and for me, he is the goat with no doubt. They, along with Rod Laver are the greatest of all time, not Federer. To date, Laver remains the only player to have twice won all four Grand Slam singles tournaments during the same calendar year. Serena Williams is arguably the best female professional tennis player in the history of the game. Borg dominated Wimbledon, winning the title five consecutive years from 1976 to 1980. Tennis Analyst, I agree with you and often think to myself how many Grand Slam singles titles Juan Martin Del Potro would have won, had constant wrist and other injuries not curtailed the majority of his tennis career. Rafael "The King of Clay" Nadal suffers from lack of clay tournaments. When most people think of the top ten golfers of all time, Tiger Woods or Jack Nicklaus are likely to come to mind. Answer: For starters Nadal is four years younger than Federer so age does play a role. Question: Why is Maria Sharapova not in the list of greatest women's tennis players? Let the race for the most Grand Slam singles titles begin and continue! Certainly the current generation of players including Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic along with perhaps Murray and Wawrinka at times would be one. Your logic is pathetic! Australian Open … For example, in the womens’ I was a massive fan of Caroline Wozniacki, who won many WTA tournaments and was number 1 for nearly 2 years. That is a career to be envied. Answer: I have actually been considering including Rosewall in this top 10 list recently. By Verhoeff, Bert/Anefo via Wikimedia Commons. Gonzalo, you’re a very bad sport. If he plays long enough he could approach 25 Grand Slam titles although that might be a reach. I used to be for Rafael Nadal. The highest ranked players who earn the most can afford to have multiple coaches, fitness experts, cooks, etc. Gonzalo, you don't seem to understand the issues of what constitutes cheating. Nadal is GOAT for sure. Grand Slam singles titles is the most important thing to the top players. I have done a very extensive research on tennis players recently to carefully examine each of the top players. I know that show must attract the crowd, but this decision has also some disadvantages: 1) makes much more difficult to defend No 1 for Nole, 2) increases RF's rank above many young players who play all the time during 2020 season. Grand Slam singles titles will be the deciding factor of the GOAT after all 3 players have retired. Regardless of what you write and I understand this is an article about fantasy GOAT rankings, I still only care about who will end up with the reality of the most Grand Slam singles titles, after all 3 of Federer, Djokovic and Nadal have retired. Djokovic should've at least held an edge over Nadal, on his best surface (HC). Now, Novak also *used* to distract the whole game by showing extreme tiredness and in this way taking his time to "recover". One thing I think most fans can agree on is that we are currently witnessing 3 of the greatest ever in Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Novak Djokovic. Congratulations Dominic Thiem on winning the US Open. Bjorn is the second tennis player who can be in Top 5 easily if he played longer. Federer holds the advantage on hard courts and grass. Nadal has also won 4 US Opens and an Australian Open on hardcourt. I think Roger and Rafael are racking up more slams because they are playing longer and are able to maintain a high level of play despite aging. Consider also that Nadal is five years younger than Federer. With those killer ground strokes and returns of serve, no top-10 list would be complete without Andre Agassi. Grand Slam singles titles are what counts the most. Nadal, repeatedly has harassed the opponent by requesting additional time before serving. Both had long careers, well over 100 titles, and were ranked number 1 in the world for many years. While it is difficult to draw comparisons of players from different generations I think Nadal has proven that he deserves to be considered among the best to ever grace the courts. Well, for starters we include him on our list of all-time greats. The point I’m trying to make is that in the modern day era, if one of or both of Nadal or Djokovic are able to eclipse Federer’s current record of 20 Grand Slam singles titles, they deserve to because Federer has had a mainly dream run with injuries in Grand Slam tournaments and both Nadal and Djokovic would have achieved this incredibly important milestone it in a shorter time frame than Federer. Presumably, Federer will be retired by then, possibly also Nadal, but we will have to wait and see. Plan ahead to get fairly priced tickets for next summer's Wimbledon championships. If it makes you happy, leave and name whoever you want as your so called current and future GOAT for all the criteria you have mentioned. It would not matter to me if you or anyone else were the lecturer trying to explain your theory to me in different ways for a whole semester or more. Tyran, you seem to take delight in mentioning what Federer did when he was younger. Answer: I think without a doubt that Rafael Nadal is the best player to ever play on clay. Federer is only number 1 on polls because he is the most popular. If you take clay court matches out of the mix, Federer has the advantage of 13-10 in head-to-head matches. 102 in … It’s only 1 Grand Slam tournament and has the same and equal importance as a Grand Slam title as the French Open, Australian Open and US Open. The competition from other aspirants from many countries is of the highest possible standard. Nadal has won his Grand Slam singles titles at a much quicker rate than Federer. Back to the Tennis History lecture theatre for you. In 2018 and 2019, Halep won her first two Grand Slam singles titles and also reached the … The 1990s really was a great time for tennis. Tyrone is 100% correct about his comment about media outlets in his country regarding the most important statistic. By all means, keep having your fun and your outlet in future comments if you wish but my fun and the Big three's main focus will be who ends up with the most Grand Slam singles titles. Even Federer himself has acknowledged her dominance in the sport. It is the Tennis player’s equivalent of The Championship Game, Grand Final, World Cup, World Championships, Olympics (but not Tennis, instead other sports at the Olympics) or Test Match, to name some of the other major sports finals from around the world. I still have and shall only care about who ends up winning the most Grand Slam singles titles AFTER all 3 of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic have retired. History and trivia on Australia's biggest tennis tournament. Who are the 10 best basketball players of all time? Answer: I did take that into account, just like I took into account that most of Nadal’s Grand Slam titles have come on clay, and Djokovic has not won a Grand Slam title since 2016. Women’s professional tennis has faced decades of sexism. Here, you’ll find just enough information to sound like an Arthur Ashe aficionado the next time you get talking tennis. I have had a lifelong passion for the game of tennis from my days as a competitive youth player to now following the world's top players. I think it’s a magnificent achievement just to win one Grand Slam event, let alone more. If I were a professional tennis player as good as those 3 players, the only evidence I need is Grand Slam singles titles won. I am placing him in the tenth position along with Andre Agassi as I feel that both players are worthy of a top ten. If he had been allowed to play, Rod Laver would have won at least 25 Grand Slam singles titles. Looking at their head to head matches Rafa holds a 23-15 edge, but 13 of those victories came on clay. Cheating should not be allowed. Certainly his 11 French Open titles should be enough to make this perfectly clear. Question: What do you think about the 1000 masters series complete by Novak? It's just that other players are quicker to serve. I would place Lew Hoad in the 15 to 20 range all-time. I am not saying you or your anyone else are wrong, I am simply saying I want to see who wins the most Grand Slam singles titles. GOAT is not even in my vocabulary. Gonzalo, don’t worry about character. Question: How good was John McEnroe at tennis? Hopefully, matches without crowds or very limited crowds will help his opponents. Believe me, the top tennis players only really care who wins the most Grand Slam singles titles. There are lot of parameters that were not taken into consideration. Djokovic has certainly played the best level of tennis out of the 3 from 2011 onwards. I have been following tennis for a very long time and tennis commentators in my country always mention Grand Slam singles statistics as their main statistic. It’s an unfair advantage. Rod Laver was absolutely brilliant in winning the Grand Slam twice in 1962 and 1969. Game set and match to Nadal and Djokovic. His Grand Slam singles strike rate is much better than Federer. Top 15, most definitely. Also players care much more about GS. I do think that the five-set match is a fair determination of who is better in a head to head match, and certainly, a player's level of physical conditioning is an important part of how good a player they are.
Sudoku 6 Cases, Rôti De Dinde Orloff, Horaires Messes Pays Bigouden, Grand Bahia Principe Tulum Transat, Vicariat épiscopal Fribourg, Comment Donner Une Dîme Agréable à Dieu, Pierre Fertilité Cornaline, Sony Appareil Photo 2019, Visiter La Corse En Autocar, Maillots De Bain Sommaires Mots Fléchés, Contrôler Tv Samsung Avec Google Home, Purification Du Corps Par Les Plantes, Electre Euripide Analyse, Bague Gucci Homme,